<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Editor's Blog - Latest Comments in Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://theeditorsblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://theeditorsblog.disqus.com/do_you_think_our_letters_are_too_long/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:23:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8332193</link><description>i think they are fine, they are not too long</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">musica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:23:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8256809</link><description>Hi Nick:
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;I don't have time to read the newspaper everyday, but the section that I find myself always going back to is the editorial page. And especially the Letters to the editor.  My preference would be shorter letters, especially if you can get opposing viewpoints. 
&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8190631</link><description>Nick - 
&lt;br&gt;1) This to confirm that your new communication system apparently works.
&lt;br&gt;2) Your article was too long
&lt;br&gt;3) Anne Hines (author) wrote: "Everything worth saying has been said before at least once. And everything not worth saying has been said even more often than that."
&lt;br&gt;4) Personally, I think you've got the major premise wrong:  its not that everyone should be given the chance to speak, but that everything worth saying should be said.  In the end, the limits for letters will be set (driven) by the economics of whatever your newspaper can afford to publish.  Brevity will be dictated by money, so when you choose which letters to publish, choose wisely.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Cutter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8190595</link><description>You are right.  The letters are too long and tend to be opinionated rants rather than thoughtful opinions.  Printing more, but short letters, will bring a better perspective of what the readers think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mkates</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8139193</link><description>Rather than focusing on the letters being too long the owners of the Telegraph could be improving the paper by removing the liberal and left wing writers on the editorial staff.  The Nashua Telegraph has evolved from being a moderate paper to being a left wing rag.  Some of the stories and writers are excellant on some of the local storys but I gag on the papers slanted extreme viewpoints.  If another newspaper springs up in the Nashua area with a moderate or conservative viewpoint I will drop the paper in a heartbeat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:06:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8137116</link><description>You should keep it at a maximum of 250 words, any more and all we would get is more incorrect spelling and bad grammar.  We see enough of that in the rest of the paper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cjbonz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8137069</link><description>Nick, I agree that you should have a limit on letters. It's my preference to read more letters rather than one longer one that could have been abbreviated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MoreCowbell25</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8136443</link><description>Nice quote!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carol Mannarino</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8136432</link><description>Nick--as you know I e-mailed you directly and asked for 350, but it is to be any less, please let us know.  I guess the new communication system is working, but you might want to suggest that everyone on this list set up a log in as I just did.  I am sure it makes things easier</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howmorse77</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8136406</link><description>I think you should expand your paper, and allot more space for letters. And I think you should thank your lucky stars that you operate a newspaper in an  area where your readers can string so many words into intelligible sentences.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;But seriously, I really think you should expand the paper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carol Mannarino</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:45:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8136298</link><description>Your article is too long</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Ziegel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8132930</link><description>I agree that letters should be shortened to a maximum of 20-250 words, strictly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John D. PIlla</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:31:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8099523</link><description>I am casting my vote for community editorials to be no longer than 250 words.  Let's make our points quickly; allow for many voices to be heard; and, support people to get into the conversation (s).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">suze scholl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:26:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you think our letters are too long?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/theeditorsblog/2009/04/11/do-you-think-our-letters-are-too-long/#comment-8095204</link><description>I have made this [letter] longer, because I have not had the time to make it shorter.
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;    -- Blaise Pascal, "Lettres provinciales", letter 16, 1657
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Letter writers should have the courtesy to take the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">quotequad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:44:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
